However I don't want to understate how powerful some of the plugins in LMMS are. I want to point out that a lot of what makes this aspect better in FL Studio is FL's popularity, the different types of technical difficulties you might come upon, and tricks you might find interesting have likely already been experienced and thoroughly discussed online because so many people use FL. However FL comes with a nice array of pre-loaded plugins like Gross-Beat, that are quite powerful. I don't want to say that LMMS isn't capable of accommodating these plugins because I am not super computer literate and it is possible that there are ways to make it work. The VST and Plugin Support is probably one of the biggest advantages to FL Studio I noticed immediately. Visually FL Studio is much prettier than LMMS, LMMS has a very stripped back retro-vibe while FL Studio has a very hi-tech look with lots of colors and graphics. Before I get into this I want to point out how impressed I've become with LMMS as a free software in comparison to the 200-300 dollar competitors For free options, LMMS is the closest thing to FL Studio in terms of look and performance.įor paid options, I would suggest Cubase as it’s packed with great software, is relatively easy to use, and is capable of doing anything you would do with it.I've been using LMMS for about 2 years and recently decided to try a paid DAW, specifically FL Studio, I wanted to talk a little bit about the differences I've noticed and give some insight to those of you who may be using LMMS as your DAW of choice, especially if it is your first one. There are many great alternatives to FL Studio, and I believe it comes down to personal preference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |